2018713&ensp·&ensp3. Whether the court of appeals correctly held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in enjoining the State to provide fish passage by addressing barrier culverts on a reasonable schedule necessary to ensure that the State acts expeditiously to remedy a
2011728&ensp·&enspof the crime. In setting aside the conviction, the Court of Appeal partially based its decision on this Courts decision in R. v. Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5,  1 S.C.R. 190. Held (McLachlin C.J and Binnie, Fish and Cromwell JJ. dissenting): The appeal should be allowed. The order for a new trial should be set aside and the conviction restored.
2018101&ensp·&enspSupreme Court of the United States On PetitiOn fOr a Writ Of CertiOrari tO the United StateS COUrt Of aPPealS fOr the federal CirCUit A (800) 2743321 (800) 3596859 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI 278735 LEON STAMBLER, Petitioner, v. MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INC., Respondent. edward r. nelson III Counsel of Record nelson Bumgardner PC
2003822&ensp·&ensp2 The parties arguments rely solely on the distinction between an employee (or servant) and an independent contractor (or nonservant agent) as articulated in Hammermill Paper Co. v. Rust Engg Co., 243 A.2d 389, 392 (Pa. 1962).As the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently noted, the relevant factors in determining whether particular relationship is that of an employee
The court found that all transportation charges made by plaintiff to its customers during the period involved were for transportation of materials prior to sale that no sale took place until delivery to the customers and that plaintiff's bills to its customers included a charge for both the materials [51 Cal.2d 644] and transportation. From